Thanks for your comment Zen.
I sort of agree and disagree at the same time. In my paper I used the dual image as a first step: I then used T.S. Eliot's poem 'Prurock' as an example of temporally extending this phenomena. The conflicting rhythms of that poem is easier to read than to speak because in speaking it you must commit to particular cadences and the poem itself resists easy classification. In reading it, however, the unconscious mind automatically produces multiple cadence structures, and by flipping from one 'draft' to another as read you perform minor revisions that doesn't always fit in with the previous draft. Dennett's point is that we are largely unaware of these revisions, even though they may sequentially rearrange information to make the new 'draft' fit. This phenomenon is more difficult to identify in temporally orientated phenomena because time itself presses the need to move on. So I think that moving phenomena is a lot closer to a tic-tack-toe analogy. It's a bit like the movement of the eyes: quick, darting and fragmented: even through we perceive it to be calm and steady.