Forums / General Discussion / Vimeo vs Television
- Known Issues 3
- Bugs 1782
- Feature Requests 1165
- Projects 416
- General Discussion 1374
- Technical Help 1097
- Cameras 240
- API 111
This conversation is missing your voice. Take five seconds to join Vimeo or log in.
- Vimeo: About / Blog / Roadmap / Developers / Community Guidelines / Forums / Help! / Site Map
- Legal: © 2008 Vimeo, LLC. All rights reserved. / Terms & Conditions / Privacy Statement



.
I've never watched alot of television, but since discovering this site, I allow myself "vimeo viewing time." On weekends, especially if it's cold and rainy (as it has been here) it seems that I'm always checking for new clips/comments. It's become an obsession, really.
You know that tagline thing, where they get psuedo-celebrities to say 'thankyou for watching channel 7'. I always hear that as 'thankyou for watching channel 7, because we know we don't deserve it. We suck. We've always sucked, and now we really need people like you to continue watching, because we're going under. Help us. Help us please. We're dying. Oh god, It's so cold. Hold me tight. I can't see. I'm so cold. I'm scared mummy, I'm scared. Hold me!'
Or, you know. Something like that.
Basically TV is shit. In Australia, it seems channels 7,9 and 10 are competing to become the most dumbed down station. And, even SBS has ads during the programs now. And cable?? Fuck that! I'm not going to pay for 8 hours per day of the simpsons, and 35 useless channels, 12 dedicated to sport, shopping channels and christian evangelists 24 hours a day. Even the movie channels play the dickiest crap ever, and rarely play quality flicks.
It's steadily getting worse, and is going to drive itself into the ground. Good riddance.
Tallulah:..why not take it everywhere you go?..i do..i even have camera mounts for my car so i can drive around..i feel naked without at least 1 video camera with me all the time.i look like a man with a purse.
andrea
20 months ago:
I agree: great little cocky head nod. I also think vimeo will lead to people being exposed to lots of little natural expressions and movement and suddenly, TV will look EVEN MORE plastic than it does now.
This kind of sums it up haha
found here: vimeo.com/clip:916
i look at almost EVERYTHING as a potential video. i think my husband's getting sick of it, but i can't help myself. on the other hand, my nieces love it!
'real' reality television
Why would I want to watch a show about pretty/handsome actors? They're annoying to look at.
You pretty much have the right to film anywhere you want until someone tells you to stop. NOTHING BAD CAN HAPPEN TO YOU.
I want to make a video about this, telling people about their rights so they're not afraid to film in places that feel "forbidden."
dalas, I like that video idea. Take some anti-anxiety pills and go for it.
usatoday.com/tech/columnist/andrewkantor/2005-12-29-camera-laws_x.htm
I didn't want to fuss so I obliged but also asked why I wasn't allowed to shoot - according to centre management, anti-terroism policy - so they basically said people filming/taking photos in the centre could pose a security/terroist threat - it was pretty obvious what I was doing but I was having a good day - didn't want to screw it up...
A few days ago we had bad thunder/lightening and my HDTV box isn't booting atm (needs a reset) but I haven't been bothered to do it. If this happened one year ago, I would have been on to it the second I noticed :P
amen and amen.
thank the good Lord for ABC and SBS.... and bit torrent.
For me Channel 10 seems like a preppy teenager - young and immature, full of bling but no real content
Channel 9 is trying to be the suarv Sydney station - but it seems so detached - extremely commercial, big monster organisation kind of thing.
Channel 7 is a bit better but I can see how it is trying to get some of 10 and 9 into itself, effectivly destroying what I thought was a decent station (ie a mix of Australian and American)
ABC is conservative and I hope they stay that way (although cutting the Glass House was a big mistake *grr*)
SBS is the rogue person with the crazy makeup in the corner - different, a bit unusual but once you get to know them your life is much better.
Anyway, enough of my crappy analogies :P
You can't take a camera into Whole Foods grocery stores either.
Of course, I don't think we have a 'patriot act' equivalent yet, but it'll only be a matter of time.
Just from browsing this quickly, it doesn't seem that they've come up with any laws to stop you filming... I'm still reading though.
A good one was that there was a proposal to add a blanket ban on filming at Bondi Beach. Oh dear, they do try their hardest, don't they.
Here you go, this should be relevant to NSW: 4020.net/words/photorights.shtml
"Private Land
Every time you enter private land, you do so with the understanding you consent to any requirements the property's owner may impose upon you. Irrespective of whether the land is freely accessible to the public, if a property owner (or their agent) tells you to cease taking photographs, for whatever reason, then there is nothing you can do about it. Stop it.
As pointed out by Professor George Williams in "Picture this: city puts photo ban in the frame":
The law would say that once you own land you get to control what goes on there.
The basic problem is that so much of our space these days is out of public hands and in control of private enterprise. [%u2026]
[T]he law recognises few public rights on private property. It is a very large debate around the world. It has become a big issue in the US where shopping centres can ban people wearing T-shirts with political slogans, and the courts have sought to define quasi-public spaces.
Hence the difficulty taking photographs inside department stores, shopping centers, "walmarts" or supermarkets. They may be areas freely open to the public and might also be regarded as the "village square or commons" of our time, but they are still private land, and thus come under the control & regulation of their owners. Which means they can prohibit almost anything (including photography) on their land and there is nothing you can do about it. Their turf, their rules. No Bill of Rights in Australia = no Freedom of Expression.
Once you leave their property however, there is nothing to prevent you from taking photographs from outside its borders. This was the finding in the 1937 Victoria Park case, and it is still law. Thus for example the July 2006 photography ban at Melbourne's Southgate Precinct was carefully limited to pictures taken inside the centre. Even management admitted they were powerless to stop people from taking photographs outside.
What if you take photos, publish them, and are then contacted (threatened?) by the property owner, claiming you have no right to display or sell images of their "private space"? Frankly, ignore them. They may be able to restrict you while shooting the picture, but they cannot do anything once the images have been taken (unless of course the photos are defamatory or infringe trademarks, trade secrets etc). As noted earlier there is no general "right to privacy" here, especially for publicly accessible areas. Furthermore in Australia there is no concept of ownership over the appearance of architectural spaces."
-- So, If you are asked to stop - YOU HAVE TO STOP, or at least make them THINK you have stopped. If they ask you to leave, YOU HAVE TO LEAVE. But, once you are off their property you can do whatever the hell you want with the photos or video, you can even continue filming them from the street if you want.
Oh, and the two shows that are actually decent right now: The Colbert Report and 30 Rock.
But I watch it all on my computer.
*If this post makes no sense, it's because everything in square brackets has been censored so I don't incriminate myself.
*edit: Ooooh, I see. No, I wasn't referring to anything you said.
Waiting 6 months to see a show based on today's news seems pretty dumb. If you wanted to do it legally could you subscribe to it thru iTunes? Or is it not in the au iTunes store?
iTunes store costs money... ripoff... it's TV! There's no way I'm paying money to watch a TV show. Call me old fashioned but TV is supposed to be free. The whole cable thing is a waste of money too. I'd rather buy the DVDs... which I plan to.
Plus, what is the quality like from iTunes? I'd assume it's encoded to play on an iPod, which would suck.
This great lecutre forwarded to me by Mark Pesce may be interesting to see - the demise of the TV networks and the growth of online distribution.
youtube.com/view_play_list?p=17BAA6A4AA56853D
Need I say anymore??? :P
Ahhh, memories.